The End

“The Creation-Evolution Controversy,” Inquiry Press, Midland,

MI, 1987 (7th printing; 1st in 1976), pg. 44.

Timothy was warned of these evolutionists:

“O Timothy,

keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane

[and] vain babbling, and opposition of science falsely so called:

Which some professing have erred concerning the faith”

Tim. 6:20-21, KJV).

Certainly one example of “professors of false science”

would be those involved in evolutionary scientism. It is this

growing godlessness—as it was in the days of Noah—that in-

creasingly ripens the overall state of man for God’s wrath and

judgement.

Most people realize that there must be an end. If there is a

beginning, then there must be an ending. Even science has

laws. The First Law of Thermodynamics tells us that matter

and energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Since we are

here, we must have had a beginning. Thus it also means we

had to have had a beginning outside the laws of science, by

special creation. The other alternative, evolution, is a vacuous

absurdity, totally without substance or credibility. Evolution

also depends on a miracle—spontaneous generation—which

requires a greater faith for it is not supported by the basic sci-

entific law of cause and effect.

By yet another measure, evolution is more “religious” than

creationism. Creationism has given rise to only three religions:

181